﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
						<!-- generator="e107" -->
						<!-- content type="Forum / topic" -->
						<rss version="0.92">
						<channel>
						<title>Proiect SEMPER FIDELIS : Forum / topic</title>
						<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/</link>
						<description></description>
						<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:39:11 +0300</lastBuildDate>
						<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>

							<item>
							<title>Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>La dezbaterile de ieri pe marginea legilor securitatii, tinute la Intercontinental, a participat, cum era si firesc, un reprezentant al asociatiei - colonelul. </description>
							<author>noauthor@nospam.com ()</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Cred ca merita comentat acest proiect - personal, cred ca e un mare bull shit, o facatura cu paragrafe copiate din celelalte legi, o salata de securitate.</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>si completare - unul dintre motivele principale pentru care vor unii sa puna mina pe STS si SPP il reprezinta resursele materiale si financiare de care dispun a</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Academia Catavencu de astazi, 20 septembrie, acorda intreaga pagina 3 conceptiei gresite a ultimului pachet de legi privind securitatea nationala propus de PNL.</description>
							<author>marep@nospam.com (me)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Din "surse de la Cotroceni" am aflat ca premierul a facut pasul inapoi si a trimis acest "pachet" spre avizare, conform legilor in vigoare, tuturor celor in dre</description>
							<author>francisc@nospam.com (colonelul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>e cam greu la varsta lor colonele sa mai invetze cate ceva, mai bine prefera sa-si dea cu parerea la unele televiziuni, dar se pare ca si realizatorii emisiunil</description>
							<author>D.Matache@nospam.com (free sky)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Vom vedea cum se vor implica in aceste dezbateri proaspetii directori din SRI si SIE. Mai ales Buratino de la SIE care atunci cind era consilier pe probleme int</description>
							<author>francisc@nospam.com (colonelul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>La Palatul Victoria acest "pachet" pare a fi cel mai greu digerabil. Varianta cu trecerea STS la MAI ma ingrozeste gindindu-ma ca nimeni nu citeste mai bine leg</description>
							<author>francisc@nospam.com (colonelul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Mie mi se par mai grave neclaritatea pachetului de legi in privinta mai multor aspecte ce tin de:- stabilirea clara a categoriilor de persoane ce pot fi suspuse</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Nu poti introduce modificarile tale pe variantele plecate de la guvern, ca sa le bagam pe site? O sa mai lucram si noi pe ele, mai ales ca ne bucuram sa regasim</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Vad ca strategia asta ofera cateva amanunte despre desfasurarea unor activitati de protectie a unor demnitari, dar nu vad nimic despre un Management integrat al</description>
							<author>blackwater_romania@nospam.com (blackwater)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Tare subiect, frumos abandon! Art.16 este sublim si art.20 devastator ...</description>
							<author>aa@nospam.com (dorobant)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>un singur lucru nu este prevazut in lege: cine si cum controleaza pe cei care "securizeaza" informatia de interes national, public au privat!</description>
							<author>aa@nospam.com (dorobant)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>tendinta globala in chestiuni de securitate nationala este centralizarea spre un control eficient al informatiilor si actiunilor. Poate ar merita deschis un top</description>
							<author>echo@nospam.com (echo)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>echo> una singura institutie controlata de ... toate institutiile! se poate asa ceva ?</description>
							<author>aa@nospam.com (dorobant)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>bre nenicilor, care va mai bagati la pariu? ca ne provoca fratele seven pe chatbox (si mai vreau sa mai beau niste beri)  !lol Eu zic ca trece pachetul in luna </description>
							<author>echo@nospam.com (echo)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>... la art.3 (10) pct. "a"  ... ma intreb care ar putea fi   citez "generate de acţiuni ale serviciilor adverse de informaţii"  acele servicii adverse! Unde n</description>
							<author>aa@nospam.com (dorobant)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>CEDO a constatat ca Legea 51/1991, care permitea procurorilor sa intercepteze abuziv convorbiri telefonice private, nu este conforma cu Conventia EuropeanaRefer</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>[http://www.gardianul.ro/2007/05/04/editorial-c27/legile_secu_un_accelerat_senatul_ultima_gara-s94077.html]  ?!</description>
							<author>adyiancu62@nospam.com (enforcer)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Deci pana la urma vor sa o treaca asa cum era prezentata in emisiune?Jesus!Apropos ca mi-a mai atras ceva atentia.Stimatul prim ministru nu a comis cumva un act</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>gura pacatosului adevar graieste</description>
							<author>adyiancu62@nospam.com (enforcer)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>se pare ca se ingroasa gluma  [code][http://www.gardianul.ro/2007/05/09/actualitate-c24/contract_prenuptial_psd_ia_tvr_pnl_ia_sie-s94320.html/code] . de fapt e </description>
							<author>adyiancu62@nospam.com (enforcer)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Oameni buni, am trait sa o vad si pe asta. Pe drumul spre Ploiesti, e pe dreapta la un moment dat un panou d'ala marele, albastru la culoare (al cui o fi???? ?!</description>
							<author>batranu_ro2006@nospam.com (batranu)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>bre batrine, te faci ca nu stii ca traim in tara in care da e de fapt nu si invers, unde legea e nelege si invers, unde meritul e nemerit si invers, unde prim m</description>
							<author>dragos@nospam.com (om simplu)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Da mai om simplu. Dar sunt un optimist de felul meu (in primul rand) si sper la mai bine.In al doilea rand sunt roman si ma doare rau cand vad curvasaria de la </description>
							<author>batranu_ro2006@nospam.com (batranu)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>echo wrote ...bre nenicilor, care va mai bagati la pariu? ca ne provoca fratele seven pe chatbox (si mai vreau sa mai beau niste beri)  !lol Eu zic ca trece pac</description>
							<author>mihai30dec@nospam.com (mihai)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Dar e prea josnic, d-na Daniela. Toate valorile umane sunt calcate in picioare si terfelite. La nivelul la care se pretind acesti oameni, ar trebui sa se gandea</description>
							<author>batranu_ro2006@nospam.com (batranu)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>batranu, se numeste campanie negativa si se practica dintotdeauna in lume, in diferite forme. E mai usor sa dai cu pietre, decit sa iei pietrele si sa construie</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Pai daca era cu NU banuiesc ca era pro Base nu? Ca aici la noi prin si pe langa Arad s-a umplut de panouri publicitare albastre din alea mari pe care scrie ca s</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>jungle campaign = jungle Romania = orice fara lege = jungla !ne doare pe multi batrine, da asa e in democratie cu dureri la inceput, si cu optimism si bine la s</description>
							<author>dragos@nospam.com (om simplu)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>bre mihai, le mai nimeresc si eu din greseala ...    dar nu zic niciodata hop pana nu vad parleazul cu ochii mei.</description>
							<author>echo@nospam.com (echo)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>@om simplu: habar n-am ca n-am ajuns pe acolo.Trenuletul mai merge din cate stiu.Probabil e tot ala de cand lumea,tot verde si ruginit.Adica are un look asa de </description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Tribunalul Bucuresti (TMB), Sectia Contencios, a decis vineri ca Serviciul Roman de Informatii trebuie sa-i plateasca lui Dinu Patriciu 50.000 lei noi cu titlul</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>normal ca de la mine si de la tine din buzunar se va plati ...  ~:( poate singurul lucru bun este ca s-a creat un precedent si data viitoare poate ca SRI va fi </description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Sigur ca da........si marmota invelea ciocolata in staniol.Se pare ca au mai gasit o cale sa bage ceva banuti in buzunar.(de la buget,de la popor,nu conteaza)</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Probleam nu e la SRI, caci e f. posibil ca interceptarile sa fi fost efectuate conform legii. Aici parchetul greseste cel mai mult cand refuza sa prezinte autor</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>wittman, nu cumva exista si motive serioase pentru o astfel de clasificare?.....si DIICOT n-a fost chemat in proces?????</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Felicitari, colonele! Legea securitatii se va comasa cu cea a actvitatii de inf, contrainf si protectie (exact cum tot spui de la aparitia acestui pachet), iar </description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Multumesc pentru felicitari! Imi pare rau ca m-am indoit de nea Nicu dar se pare ca el a vrut sa rupa o data pisica pentru a mai linisti spiritele si a permite </description>
							<author>francisc@nospam.com (colonelul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>si totusi ce se intampla cu SPP daca da avizul Parlamentul??</description>
							<author>cameliagab@nospam.com (cory)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>cory, e drept ca inca mai pot aparea surprize interesante, avind in vederea ca se va plimba pachetul prin parlament.... dar cred ca anul asta toata lumea isi po</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>[quote].... nu cumva exista si motive serioase pentru o astfel de clasificare?.[/quote117932018]Prin "motive serioase" vrei sa zici "motive intemeiate" sau doar</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>lol - nu-i asa ca e retorica intrebarea ta?</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>se plimba ,e bine zis numai k nu prea cred k isi vor vedea de trb /se pare k unii au un mare interes pentru aceasta lege.</description>
							<author>cameliagab@nospam.com (cory)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>LINK se pare ca n-a fost sa fie asa cum au dorit unii :!</description>
							<author>adyiancu62@nospam.com (enforcer)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>LINK</description>
							<author>adyiancu62@nospam.com (enforcer)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Bai care imi spuneti si mie ce mare smecherie e treaba asta cu demilitarizarea politiei,serv de inf si ce s-o mai fi demilitarizat?Care e avanjaul,sau motivul? </description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>flexibilitate, adaptabilitate la noile riscuri de securitate bla bla bla...plus ca in general, in tarile membre in comunitatile internationale de securitate, do</description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>pai acuma stiu ca suna frumos,dar flexibilitate,adaptabilitate nu spun mai nimic.chestiile astea trebuie argumentate chiar si sumar.ma inseleu sau in state toti</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Altair wrote ........ma inseleu sau in state toti sunt militari?Te inseli, e taman pe dos.  8) Tot ce inseamna lege si ordine (law enforcement - politie locala,</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Navy Crime Investigation Scene,dak nu ma inshel asta inseamna  NCIS</description>
							<author>mohammed_alzilzaal@nospam.com (Khalouny)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>pai atunci de ce au grade militare?</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>toti sunt agenti</description>
							<author>roxana.iancu@nospam.com (Roxana I)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Altair wrote ...pai atunci de ce au grade militare?Pai cine a zis ca ar avea grade militare?</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>pai sergent,locotenet,capitan ce sunt?</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Asa sunt denumirile, insa structura nu este una militara. De exemplu gradul imediat superior al sergentului este locotenentul, apoi capitanul si comisarul, ceea</description>
							<author>av_wittmann@nospam.com (Wittmann)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>bine si la ei in armata,dupa sergent(major,staff etc) urmeaza locotenentul (2 class).e ca si plt la noi.dar mi se parea ca ceva nu era coser,ca lipseau din grad</description>
							<author>mlaslean@nospam.com (Altair)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Va salut, stimati semperisti! Va rog sa imi dati niste lamuriri:1. Care este Strategia Nationala de Securitate in vigoare? Tipul actului, emitent, nr, an etc.2.</description>
							<author>iqideas30@nospam.com (David)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>LINK - strategia de securitate nationalaLINK - strategia nationala de apararecit despre actele normative din domeniu in dezbatere, sint ceva mai multe, o parte </description>
							<author>daniela@nospam.com (ex-ad)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Hotararea Parlamentului 30/2008 este un act prin care Parlamentul aproba un document respectiv SNAp:"Publicat in Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 799 din 28/11/2</description>
							<author>serviciu8616@nospam.com (truepride)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Scuzati intrazieriea, numai acum am apucat sa ma uit atent peste problema asadar, de notat ce spune/scrie ex-ad, la care mai adaug:Aceste doua acte desi relativ</description>
							<author>serviciu8616@nospam.com (truepride)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>truepride wrote ...Aceste doua acte desi relativ bine conturate nu reprezinta in totalitate SSNR si SNAp.Argumentabil, pozitie sustinuta de unii autori la care </description>
							<author>iqideas30@nospam.com (David)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Sa le luam pe rand:Forta juridica insemna strict actul normativ in raport cu celelate acte, adica o ierarhie legala.Cred ca dvs va referiti limita temporala a a</description>
							<author>serviciu8616@nospam.com (truepride)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Bun, la limita temporala a aplicarii legii ma refeream. Asa cum am spus mai sus, am citit H.P. 30-2008 privind aprobarea Strategiei nationale de aparare a tarii</description>
							<author>iqideas30@nospam.com (David)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>Redescopăr, că trăim într-o țară a absurdului...Citesc și eu linistit pe ici pe colo câte ceva ,și dau peste d-na sau d-ra Raisa Ekaterina Ivatenko fos</description>
							<author>eagle_big@nospam.com (chimistul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>@Chimistul, vezi ca in aceeasi lege, recte L51/1991 modificata si completata-2014, la art. 7  se pomeneste de CSAT si spune cam asa:Consiliul Suprem de Aparare </description>
							<author>tzaran_ovidiu@nospam.com (djebel)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>@djebel , în aliniatul 4 am specificat acest lucru , dar rămâne întrebarea (dacă nu o fi secretul lui Polichinelle)  e ce legiuitorul nu a trecut la Art.11</description>
							<author>eagle_big@nospam.com (chimistul)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Re: Legea securitatii nationale</title>
							<description>@Chimistul, cu scuzele de rigoare, am trecut ca o briza peste "cele doua articole" amintite.Bun, acum sa revenim si sa facem analiza pe text. La art.6, alin. (2</description>
							<author>tzaran_ovidiu@nospam.com (djebel)</author>
							<link>https://www.semperfidelis.ro/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1120</link>
							</item>
						</channel>
						</rss>